There are female athletes who will be competing at the Olympic Games this summer after undergoing treatment to make them less masculine.
Still others are being secretly investigated for displaying overly manly characteristics, as sport’s highest medical officials attempt to quantify — and regulate — the hormonal difference between male and female athletes.
Caster Semenya, the South African runner who was so fast and muscular that many suspected she was a man, exploded onto the front pages three years ago. She was considered an outlier, a one-time anomaly.
But similar cases are emerging all over the world, and Semenya, who was banned from competition for 11 months while authorities investigated her sex, is back, vying for gold.
Semenya and other women like her face a complex question: Does a female athlete whose body naturally produces unusually high levels of male hormones, allowing them to put on more muscle mass and recover faster, have an “unfair” advantage?
In a move critics call “policing femininity,” recent rule changes by the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), the governing body of track and field, state that for a woman to compete, her testosterone must not exceed the male threshold.
If it does, she must have surgery or receive hormone therapy prescribed by an expert IAAF medical panel and submit to regular monitoring. So far, at least a handful of athletes — the figure is confidential — have been prescribed treatment, but their numbers could increase. Last month, the International Olympic Committee began the approval process to adopt similar rules for the Games.
There’s a lot going on here, but here’s what jumped out at us immediately: Women, particularly women athletes, are constantly told they’re not as strong or fast as men—and now that they’re proving otherwise, they’re being forced to undergo hormone treatments. We don’t think it’s a coincidence that women of color are coming under fire for this more than white women. From the article: “Lindsay Perry, another scientist, says sometimes whole teams of African women are dead ringers for men.” This is a clear example of how we’ve constructed a very particular, very narrow ideal of femininity and womanhood that devalues and casts aside black women in particular.
That’s like saying men who are too tall can’t be allowed to play basketball, men whose have naturally more testosterone can’t compete because it’s unfair to other men, and so on, and so on. Anyone with a physically natural advantage must be hindered. That’s not how sports work. What if they told a young man he was too big to play football? You can’t only real women can compete, and real women have to be this size and have this much of a certain hormone, otherwise they’re not women….but they’re not men either.
All of the above comments. When you have to try so hard to maintain femininity and masculinity on YOUR standards…
And this is how bodies are gendered according to social standards, yet still everyone points to “undeniable biological factors” when making blanket statements about physical abilities.
the thing is it’s not a surprise when someone doesn’t find something like that attractive
when people say stuff like that i feel like going YOU DON’T SAY?!?! REALLY?? YOU DON’T LIKE ANYTHING THAT DEVIATES FROM THE GENDER NORMS THE PATRIARCHY HAS SCRIPTED FOR US? WHAT A…
David Cross calls out rape culture
I’d like to throw something out there for all the shitheads bitching about people getting offended over rape jokes.
1. joking about something normalizes it. It turns it into something people can laugh about when there is NOTHING funny about rape.
2. Because your friend laughs and…
A note to the rape joke supporters: Humor is not an invisible cloak. It does not excuse your words. Americans think that sarcasm makes us untouchable. ‘Oh I was just kidding.’ No one cares. Your words still have meaning. People who excuse their hurtful humor generally use bullying tactics to prove their point. They are dismissive, demeaning and arrogant with their responses to the concerns raised by others. But they do not have actual science behind them. Little children tell the stupidest jokes and they think adults are fools for not getting them. The grownups know the score. People who want to explore the social impact of humor have done plenty of research which proves that jokes normalize violence, marginalize minority groups and promote social stigmas. If you want to use the “my humor is too smart for you” theory, I would recommend not showing your ignorance by ignoring the actual academic knowledge about humor.
And yes, some victims find the jokes to be a safe way to increase their feelings of mastery over the issue. People use many strategies to cope with trauma. Simply saying “this is a way I cope” does not mean all people in every setting need to engage in the behavior. Maybe “rape jokes” DO have therapeutic value, but that does not give everyone in the world permission to joke about the trauma of others with a dismissive, “you just don’t get it.” We get it. We get it all the time.